Assessment of Human Gingival Fibroblast Proliferation after Laser Stimulation In Vitro Using Different Laser Types and Wavelengths (1064, 980, 635, 450, and 405 nm)-Preliminary Report
Sterczała, B., Grzech-Leśniak, K., Michel, O., Trzeciakowski, W., Dominiak, M. & Jurczyszyn, K.
Journal of personalized medicine, 2021;11(2).
Comparison of different irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal: an in vitro study
Akyuz Ekim SN, Erdemir A.
Microsc Res Tech. 2015;78(3):230-239.
Efficacy of laser-based irrigant activation methods in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities
Deleu E, Meire MA, De Moor RJG.
Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(2):831-835.
Comparison of four different techniques for performing an osteotomy: a biomechanical, radiological and histological study on rabbits tibias
Elmadag, M. et al.
The bone & joint journal, 97–B(12), pp.1628–1633
Laser activated irrigation with SWEEPS modality reduces concentration of sodium hypochlorite in root canal irrigation
Lei, L., Wang, F., Wang, Y., Li, Y. & Huang, X.
Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2022;39, p.102873.
A comparative SEM assessment for the ability of PIPS, XP-Finisher and PUI to eliminate smear layer and open dentinal tubules
Obeid, M., Elshaboury, E. & Obeid, R.
Egyptian Dental Journal,2022; 68(2), pp.1937–1943.
Efficacy of different Er:YAG laser-activated photoacoustic streaming modes compared to passive ultrasonic irrigation in the retreatment of curved root canals
Petričević, G.K., Katić, M., Anić, I., Salarić, I., Vražić, D. & Bago, I.
Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022;26(11), pp.6773–6781.
Comparative effects of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser, the shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming, and the conventional needle irrigation on apical extrusion of irrigants
Vatanpour, M., Fazlyab, M. & Nikzad, M.
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, 39, p.102878.
Effectiveness of Different Methods in Removing Dentin Caries of Primary Teeth: Micro-CT and SEM Evaluation
Duruk G, Kizilci E, Malkoç MA.
The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2022;46(3), pp.211–218.
Evaluation of the microleakage of different class V cavities prepared by using Er:YAG laser, ultrasonic device, and conventional rotary instruments with two dentin bonding systems (an in vitro study)
Muhammed G, Dayem R.
Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(3):969-975.